Lutim vs PictShare
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Lutim
Privacy-focused image hosting with auto-expiration
VS
PictShare
Self-hosted image and media sharing with resizing
| Feature | Lutim | PictShare |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Perl | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 300 | ★ 945 |
| First released | 2015 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Imgur | Imgur |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Lutim or PictShare better?
Neither is universally better. PictShare has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Lutim and PictShare free and open-source?
Yes. Lutim is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and PictShare under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Lutim and PictShare with Docker?
Lutim: yes. PictShare: yes.