SAML Jackson vs node-oidc-provider

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSAML Jacksonnode-oidc-provider
CategoryIdentity & SSOIdentity & SSO
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdockersource, docker
GitHub stars★ 2,257★ 3,788
First released20222016
ReplacesAuth0, WorkOSAuth0, Okta

Why pick each one

Choose SAML Jackson if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
SAML Jackson details

Choose node-oidc-provider if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
node-oidc-provider details

Frequently asked questions

Is SAML Jackson or node-oidc-provider better?

Neither is universally better. node-oidc-provider has the larger community, while SAML Jackson is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SAML Jackson and node-oidc-provider free and open-source?

Yes. SAML Jackson is licensed under Apache-2.0 and node-oidc-provider under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SAML Jackson and node-oidc-provider with Docker?

SAML Jackson: yes. node-oidc-provider: yes.

Related comparisons