FusionAuth vs SAML Jackson

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFusionAuthSAML Jackson
CategoryIdentity & SSOIdentity & SSO
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageDockerfileTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 241★ 2,257
First released20182022
ReplacesAuth0, OktaAuth0, WorkOS

Why pick each one

Choose FusionAuth if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Written in Dockerfile
FusionAuth details

Choose SAML Jackson if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
SAML Jackson details

Frequently asked questions

Is FusionAuth or SAML Jackson better?

Neither is universally better. SAML Jackson has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are FusionAuth and SAML Jackson free and open-source?

Yes. FusionAuth is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SAML Jackson under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FusionAuth and SAML Jackson with Docker?

FusionAuth: yes. SAML Jackson: yes.

Related comparisons