SHSelfHostIndex

Kubo (IPFS) vs Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
KU Kubo (IPFS) Reference implementation of the InterPlanetary File System VS RE Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare Anonymous file sharing over the Tor network
FeatureKubo (IPFS)Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, snapbinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 17,093★ 7,055
First released20152014
ReplacesDropboxWeTransfer, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose Kubo (IPFS) if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 17.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
Kubo (IPFS) details

Choose Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 7.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kubo (IPFS) or Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare better?

Neither is universally better. Kubo (IPFS) has the larger community, while Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Kubo (IPFS) and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare free and open-source?

Yes. Kubo (IPFS) is licensed under MIT and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kubo (IPFS) and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare with Docker?

Kubo (IPFS): yes. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons