Icinga 2 vs Apache SkyWalking

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureIcinga 2Apache SkyWalking
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseGPL-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageC++Java
Setup difficultyHardHard
Min. RAM512 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 2,228★ 24,915
First released20142015
ReplacesSolarWinds, PRTGNew Relic, Datadog

Why pick each one

Choose Icinga 2 if…

  • Scales to large environments
  • Active development and community
Icinga 2 details

Choose Apache SkyWalking if…

  • Full observability suite
  • Strong Apache governance
Apache SkyWalking details

Frequently asked questions

Is Icinga 2 or Apache SkyWalking better?

Neither is universally better. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Icinga 2 and Apache SkyWalking free and open-source?

Yes. Icinga 2 is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Apache SkyWalking under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Icinga 2 and Apache SkyWalking with Docker?

Icinga 2: yes. Apache SkyWalking: yes.

Related comparisons