Glances vs Icinga 2

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGlancesIcinga 2
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseLGPL-3.0GPL-2.0
LanguagePythonC++
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarydocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 33,269★ 2,228
First released20122014
ReplacesDatadogSolarWinds, PRTG

Why pick each one

Choose Glances if…

  • Very easy to run
  • Lightweight
  • Good single-host overview
Glances details

Choose Icinga 2 if…

  • Scales to large environments
  • Active development and community
Icinga 2 details

Frequently asked questions

Is Glances or Icinga 2 better?

Glances is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Icinga 2 if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Glances and Icinga 2 free and open-source?

Yes. Glances is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and Icinga 2 under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Glances and Icinga 2 with Docker?

Glances: yes. Icinga 2: yes.

Related comparisons