Beszel vs Icinga 2

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBeszelIcinga 2
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITGPL-2.0
LanguageGoC++
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 24,108★ 2,228
First released20242014
ReplacesUptimeRobotSolarWinds, PRTG

Why pick each one

Choose Beszel if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Simple multi-host view
  • Easy setup
Beszel details

Choose Icinga 2 if…

  • Scales to large environments
  • Active development and community
Icinga 2 details

Frequently asked questions

Is Beszel or Icinga 2 better?

Beszel is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Icinga 2 if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Beszel and Icinga 2 free and open-source?

Yes. Beszel is licensed under MIT and Icinga 2 under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Beszel and Icinga 2 with Docker?

Beszel: yes. Icinga 2: yes.

Related comparisons