Icinga 2 vs InfluxDB

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureIcinga 2InfluxDB
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseGPL-2.0MIT
LanguageC++Rust
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 2,228★ 31,683
First released20142013
ReplacesSolarWinds, PRTGDatadog, AWS Timestream

Why pick each one

Choose Icinga 2 if…

  • Scales to large environments
  • Active development and community
Icinga 2 details

Choose InfluxDB if…

  • Excellent for IoT and metrics
  • Rich tooling and integrations
InfluxDB details

Frequently asked questions

Is Icinga 2 or InfluxDB better?

InfluxDB is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Icinga 2 if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Icinga 2 and InfluxDB free and open-source?

Yes. Icinga 2 is licensed under GPL-2.0 and InfluxDB under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Icinga 2 and InfluxDB with Docker?

Icinga 2: yes. InfluxDB: yes.

Related comparisons