closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin vs elFinder

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Feature closet GoToSocial NoNo upspinelFinder
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseBSD-3-Clause
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcebare-metal
GitHub stars★ 6,396★ 4,800
First released20162010
ReplacesDropboxGoogle Drive, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Mature project with 6.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin details

Choose elFinder if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Active community (4.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
elFinder details

Frequently asked questions

Is closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin or elFinder better?

Neither is universally better. closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin has the larger community, while elFinder is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin and elFinder free and open-source?

Yes. closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and elFinder under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin and elFinder with Docker?

closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin: check the project docs for container support. elFinder: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons