File Browser vs elFinder

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserelFinder
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0BSD-3-Clause
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 4,800
First released20172010
ReplacesDropboxGoogle Drive, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose elFinder if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Active community (4.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
elFinder details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or elFinder better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider elFinder if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and elFinder free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and elFinder under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and elFinder with Docker?

File Browser: yes. elFinder: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons