File Browser vs elFinder

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up? Compare File Browser with Compare elFinder with

File Browser Archived Lightweight web file manager for a directory VS EL elFinder Web file manager with a desktop-style interface

Feature	File Browser	elFinder
Deploy effort	Under-an-hour setup	Read-the-docs project
Health score	15 · At risk	87 · Excellent
Status	Archived	Actively maintained
Category	File Sync & Storage	File Sync & Storage
License	Apache-2.0	BSD-3-Clause
Language	Go	JavaScript
Setup difficulty	Easy	Medium
Min. RAM	64 MB	128 MB
Deployment	docker, binary	bare-metal
GitHub stars	★ 35,937	★ 4,804
First released	2017	2010
Replaces	Dropbox	Google Drive, Dropbox

What are File Browser and elFinder?

File Browser

File Browser provides a clean web interface to manage files within a specified directory, supporting upload, download, sharing, and user accounts. It suits users who want simple browser-based access to a folder rather than a full sync platform. It ships as a single Go binary and a small Docker image.

Single-binary web file manager
User accounts and share links
Built-in editor and previews
Minimal resource usage

Read the full File Browser guide →

elFinder

elFinder is an open-source web file manager with a user interface inspired by the macOS Finder. It supports multiple storage backends, drag and drop, and image editing.

macOS Finder-style UI
Multiple storage backends
Built-in image editor

File Browser vs elFinder: key differences

The biggest difference is maintenance: File Browser's repository is archived and no longer developed, while elFinder is actively maintained. File Browser is written in Go, while elFinder is built with JavaScript. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for File Browser versus BSD-3-Clause for elFinder. File Browser is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 128 MB for elFinder. ElFinder is the more established project (first released 2010), while File Browser arrived in 2017. File Browser has the considerably larger community, at 35,937 GitHub stars versus 4,804. File Browser lists first-class Docker deployment; elFinder does not.

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

Extremely lightweight
Trivial to deploy
Good for quick file access

Watch out for

No sync client
Limited collaboration features

File Browser details

Choose elFinder if…

Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
Active community (4.8k GitHub stars)
Written in JavaScript
Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM

elFinder details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or elFinder better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider File Browser if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and elFinder free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and elFinder under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and elFinder with Docker?

File Browser: yes. elFinder: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, File Browser or elFinder?

File Browser has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 128 MB for elFinder. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.