FileBrowser Quantum vs elFinder
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FileBrowser Quantum
Enhanced web file manager fork with extra features
VS
elFinder
Web file manager with a desktop-style interface
| Feature | FileBrowser Quantum | elFinder |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,695 | ★ 4,800 |
| First released | 2024 | 2010 |
| Replaces | Google Drive, Dropbox | Google Drive, Dropbox |
Why pick each one
Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
Choose elFinder if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Active community (4.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is FileBrowser Quantum or elFinder better?
FileBrowser Quantum is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider elFinder if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are FileBrowser Quantum and elFinder free and open-source?
Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and elFinder under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and elFinder with Docker?
FileBrowser Quantum: yes. elFinder: check the project docs for container support.