File Browser vs closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile Browser closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0BSD-3-Clause
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary, source
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 6,396
First released20172016
ReplacesDropboxDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Mature project with 6.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin with Docker?

File Browser: yes. closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons