SHSelfHostIndex

FileBrowser Quantum vs closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FI FileBrowser Quantum Enhanced web file manager fork with extra features VS C closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin Global name system for secure file sharing
FeatureFileBrowser Quantum closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0BSD-3-Clause
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary, source
GitHub stars★ 7,695★ 6,396
First released20242016
ReplacesGoogle Drive, DropboxDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
FileBrowser Quantum details

Choose closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Mature project with 6.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin details

Frequently asked questions

Is FileBrowser Quantum or closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin better?

FileBrowser Quantum is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are FileBrowser Quantum and closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin free and open-source?

Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin with Docker?

FileBrowser Quantum: yes. closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons