FlowInquiry vs TicketsBot
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FlowInquiry
Project management and ticket tracking with SLA monitoring
VS
TicketsBot
Self-hostable Discord support ticket system
| Feature | FlowInquiry | TicketsBot |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Helpdesk & Ticketing |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | HTML | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 170 | ★ 26 |
| First released | 2024 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Jira, Zendesk | Zendesk |
Why pick each one
Choose FlowInquiry if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Written in HTML
Choose TicketsBot if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is FlowInquiry or TicketsBot better?
Neither is universally better. FlowInquiry has the larger community, while TicketsBot is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are FlowInquiry and TicketsBot free and open-source?
Yes. FlowInquiry is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and TicketsBot under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FlowInquiry and TicketsBot with Docker?
FlowInquiry: yes. TicketsBot: yes.