FlowInquiry vs Ticketit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FlowInquiry
Project management and ticket tracking with SLA monitoring
VS
Ticketit
Simple Laravel help desk and support ticket package
| Feature | FlowInquiry | Ticketit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Helpdesk & Ticketing |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | HTML | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 170 | ★ 864 |
| First released | 2024 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Jira, Zendesk | Zendesk, Freshdesk |
Why pick each one
Choose FlowInquiry if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Written in HTML
Choose Ticketit if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is FlowInquiry or Ticketit better?
Ticketit is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider FlowInquiry if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are FlowInquiry and Ticketit free and open-source?
Yes. FlowInquiry is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Ticketit under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FlowInquiry and Ticketit with Docker?
FlowInquiry: yes. Ticketit: check the project docs for container support.