filite vs Pomf
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
filite
Lightweight self-hosted store for files, links and pastes
VS
Pomf
Simple file uploading and sharing platform
| Feature | filite | Pomf |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Rust | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 189 | ★ 922 |
| First released | 2019 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Imgur, Pastebin.com | WeTransfer, Imgur |
Why pick each one
Choose Pomf if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is filite or Pomf better?
Neither is universally better. Pomf has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are filite and Pomf free and open-source?
Yes. filite is licensed under MIT and Pomf under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run filite and Pomf with Docker?
filite: yes. Pomf: check the project docs for container support.