Lutim vs Pomf
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Lutim
Privacy-focused image hosting with auto-expiration
VS
Pomf
Simple file uploading and sharing platform
| Feature | Lutim | Pomf |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | File Sync & Storage |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Perl | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 300 | ★ 922 |
| First released | 2015 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Imgur | WeTransfer, Imgur |
Why pick each one
Choose Pomf if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Lutim or Pomf better?
Neither is universally better. Pomf has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Lutim and Pomf free and open-source?
Yes. Lutim is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Pomf under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Lutim and Pomf with Docker?
Lutim: yes. Pomf: check the project docs for container support.