Filestash vs Hypha
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Filestash
Web-based file manager and document gateway
VS
Hypha
Self-hosted application and grant management platform
| Feature | Filestash | Hypha |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,451 | ★ 76 |
| First released | 2017 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, SharePoint | SmartSimple |
Why pick each one
Choose Hypha if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Filestash or Hypha better?
Filestash is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Hypha if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Filestash and Hypha free and open-source?
Yes. Filestash is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Hypha under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Filestash and Hypha with Docker?
Filestash: yes. Hypha: yes.