BentoPDF vs Filestash
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
BentoPDF
Powerful, privacy-first, client-side PDF toolkit that allows you to
VS
Filestash
Web-based file manager and document gateway
| Feature | BentoPDF | Filestash |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,551 | ★ 14,451 |
| First released | 2026 | 2017 |
| Replaces | — | Dropbox, SharePoint |
Why pick each one
Choose BentoPDF if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 14.6k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is BentoPDF or Filestash better?
Neither is universally better. BentoPDF has the larger community, while Filestash is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are BentoPDF and Filestash free and open-source?
Yes. BentoPDF is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Filestash under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run BentoPDF and Filestash with Docker?
BentoPDF: yes. Filestash: yes.