copyparty vs Filestash

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecopypartyFilestash
CategoryFile Sync & StorageDocument Management
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 46,121★ 14,451
First released20192017
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveDropbox, SharePoint

Why pick each one

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Choose Filestash if…

  • Unifies access to many backends
  • Easy deployment
Filestash details

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or Filestash better?

Neither is universally better. copyparty has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are copyparty and Filestash free and open-source?

Yes. copyparty is licensed under MIT and Filestash under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run copyparty and Filestash with Docker?

copyparty: yes. Filestash: yes.

Related comparisons