BentoPDF vs Hypha
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
BentoPDF
Powerful, privacy-first, client-side PDF toolkit that allows you to
VS
Hypha
Self-hosted application and grant management platform
| Feature | BentoPDF | Hypha |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | JavaScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,551 | ★ 76 |
| First released | 2026 | 2018 |
| Replaces | — | SmartSimple |
Why pick each one
Choose BentoPDF if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 14.6k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Choose Hypha if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is BentoPDF or Hypha better?
BentoPDF is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Hypha if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are BentoPDF and Hypha free and open-source?
Yes. BentoPDF is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Hypha under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run BentoPDF and Hypha with Docker?
BentoPDF: yes. Hypha: yes.