FilePizza vs XBackBone
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FilePizza
Peer-to-peer file transfers in your browser
VS
XBackBone
Lightweight file manager with full ShareX support
| Feature | FilePizza | XBackBone |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,129 | ★ 1,161 |
| First released | 2023 | 2023 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | WeTransfer |
Why pick each one
Choose FilePizza if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose XBackBone if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in PHP
Frequently asked questions
Is FilePizza or XBackBone better?
Neither is universally better. FilePizza has the larger community, while XBackBone is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are FilePizza and XBackBone free and open-source?
Yes. FilePizza is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and XBackBone under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FilePizza and XBackBone with Docker?
FilePizza: check the project docs for container support. XBackBone: check the project docs for container support.