FilePizza vs transfer.sh
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FilePizza
Peer-to-peer file transfers in your browser
VS
transfer.sh
Easy file sharing from the command line
| Feature | FilePizza | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,129 | ★ 15,881 |
| First released | 2023 | 2014 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | WeTransfer |
Why pick each one
Choose FilePizza if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose transfer.sh if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 15.9k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is FilePizza or transfer.sh better?
transfer.sh is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider FilePizza if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are FilePizza and transfer.sh free and open-source?
Yes. FilePizza is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and transfer.sh under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FilePizza and transfer.sh with Docker?
FilePizza: check the project docs for container support. transfer.sh: yes.