FilePizza vs SFTPGo
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FilePizza
Peer-to-peer file transfers in your browser
VS
SFTPGo
Full-featured SFTP, FTP and WebDAV server
| Feature | FilePizza | SFTPGo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,129 | ★ 12,371 |
| First released | 2023 | 2019 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | Dropbox |
Why pick each one
Choose FilePizza if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose SFTPGo if…
- Multi-protocol in one binary
- Flexible storage backends
- Strong access controls
Frequently asked questions
Is FilePizza or SFTPGo better?
Neither is universally better. SFTPGo has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are FilePizza and SFTPGo free and open-source?
Yes. FilePizza is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and SFTPGo under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FilePizza and SFTPGo with Docker?
FilePizza: check the project docs for container support. SFTPGo: yes.