Cloudreve vs SFTPGo
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cloudreve
File management and sharing system, supports multiple storage
VS
SFTPGo
Full-featured SFTP, FTP and WebDAV server
| Feature | Cloudreve | SFTPGo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,485 | ★ 12,371 |
| First released | 2026 | 2019 |
| Replaces | — | Dropbox |
Why pick each one
Choose Cloudreve if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 28.5k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose SFTPGo if…
- Multi-protocol in one binary
- Flexible storage backends
- Strong access controls
Frequently asked questions
Is Cloudreve or SFTPGo better?
Neither is universally better. Cloudreve has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Cloudreve and SFTPGo free and open-source?
Yes. Cloudreve is licensed under GPL-3.0 and SFTPGo under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cloudreve and SFTPGo with Docker?
Cloudreve: yes. SFTPGo: yes.