FilePizza vs qrcp
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FilePizza
Peer-to-peer file transfers in your browser
VS
qrcp
Transfer files to and from phones by scanning a QR code
| Feature | FilePizza | qrcp |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,129 | ★ 10,491 |
| First released | 2023 | 2018 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | AirDrop, Snapdrop |
Why pick each one
Choose FilePizza if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is FilePizza or qrcp better?
qrcp is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider FilePizza if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are FilePizza and qrcp free and open-source?
Yes. FilePizza is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and qrcp under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FilePizza and qrcp with Docker?
FilePizza: check the project docs for container support. qrcp: check the project docs for container support.