Cloudreve vs qrcp
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cloudreve
File management and sharing system, supports multiple storage
VS
qrcp
Transfer files to and from phones by scanning a QR code
| Feature | Cloudreve | qrcp |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,485 | ★ 10,491 |
| First released | 2026 | 2018 |
| Replaces | — | AirDrop, Snapdrop |
Why pick each one
Choose Cloudreve if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 28.5k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Cloudreve or qrcp better?
Neither is universally better. Cloudreve has the larger community, while qrcp is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Cloudreve and qrcp free and open-source?
Yes. Cloudreve is licensed under GPL-3.0 and qrcp under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cloudreve and qrcp with Docker?
Cloudreve: yes. qrcp: check the project docs for container support.