FilePizza vs Gokapi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FilePizza
Peer-to-peer file transfers in your browser
VS
Gokapi
Lightweight self-hosted file sharing with expiring links
| Feature | FilePizza | Gokapi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,129 | ★ 2,827 |
| First released | 2023 | 2021 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | WeTransfer, Firefox Send |
Why pick each one
Choose FilePizza if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose Gokapi if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is FilePizza or Gokapi better?
Neither is universally better. FilePizza has the larger community, while Gokapi is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are FilePizza and Gokapi free and open-source?
Yes. FilePizza is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Gokapi under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FilePizza and Gokapi with Docker?
FilePizza: check the project docs for container support. Gokapi: yes.