Erxes vs FluentCRM Self-Hosted

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureErxesFluentCRM Self-Hosted
CategoryHelpdesk & TicketingCRM & Business Apps
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetesdocker, source
GitHub stars★ 4,058★ 1,192
First released20172024
ReplacesZendesk, Intercom, HubSpotHubSpot, Pipedrive

Why pick each one

Choose Erxes if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Active community (4.1k GitHub stars)
Erxes details

Choose FluentCRM Self-Hosted if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
FluentCRM Self-Hosted details

Frequently asked questions

Is Erxes or FluentCRM Self-Hosted better?

Neither is universally better. Erxes has the larger community, while FluentCRM Self-Hosted is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Erxes and FluentCRM Self-Hosted free and open-source?

Yes. Erxes is licensed under GPL-3.0 and FluentCRM Self-Hosted under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Erxes and FluentCRM Self-Hosted with Docker?

Erxes: yes. FluentCRM Self-Hosted: yes.

Related comparisons