EspoCRM vs FluentCRM Self-Hosted
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted crm & business apps options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
EspoCRM
Fast and lightweight open-source CRM
VS
FluentCRM Self-Hosted
Open-source CRM and contact pipeline manager
| Feature | EspoCRM | FluentCRM Self-Hosted |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CRM & Business Apps | CRM & Business Apps |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,201 | ★ 1,192 |
| First released | 2014 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Salesforce, HubSpot | HubSpot, Pipedrive |
Why pick each one
Choose FluentCRM Self-Hosted if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is EspoCRM or FluentCRM Self-Hosted better?
Neither is universally better. EspoCRM has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are EspoCRM and FluentCRM Self-Hosted free and open-source?
Yes. EspoCRM is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and FluentCRM Self-Hosted under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run EspoCRM and FluentCRM Self-Hosted with Docker?
EspoCRM: yes. FluentCRM Self-Hosted: yes.