Duplicati vs Backup tool nono Plakar
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Duplicati
Free backup software with a friendly web UI
VS
Backup tool nono Plakar
Effortless backup with built-in verification and UI
| Feature | Duplicati | Backup tool nono Plakar |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | ISC |
| Language | C# | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,864 | ★ 2,013 |
| First released | 2008 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, Carbonite | Backblaze, CrashPlan |
Why pick each one
Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…
- Released under the ISC license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Duplicati or Backup tool nono Plakar better?
Duplicati is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Backup tool nono Plakar if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Duplicati and Backup tool nono Plakar free and open-source?
Yes. Duplicati is licensed under MIT and Backup tool nono Plakar under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Duplicati and Backup tool nono Plakar with Docker?
Duplicati: yes. Backup tool nono Plakar: yes.