BackupPC vs Duplicati
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
BackupPC
High-performance backup system for PCs and servers
VS
Duplicati
Free backup software with a friendly web UI
| Feature | BackupPC | Duplicati |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Perl | C# |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,621 | ★ 14,864 |
| First released | 2001 | 2008 |
| Replaces | CrashPlan, Time Machine | Backblaze, Carbonite |
Why pick each one
Choose BackupPC if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in Perl
Frequently asked questions
Is BackupPC or Duplicati better?
Duplicati is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider BackupPC if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are BackupPC and Duplicati free and open-source?
Yes. BackupPC is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Duplicati under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run BackupPC and Duplicati with Docker?
BackupPC: yes. Duplicati: yes.