Dino vs Tinode

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDinoTinode
CategoryMatrix & XMPPMatrix & XMPP
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageValaGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 2,472★ 13,452
First released20172016
ReplacesSkype, SlackWhatsApp, Slack

Why pick each one

Choose Dino if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Vala
Dino details

Choose Tinode if…

  • Good developer foundation
  • Multiple clients
  • Lightweight
Tinode details

Frequently asked questions

Is Dino or Tinode better?

Neither is universally better. Tinode has the larger community, while Dino is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Dino and Tinode free and open-source?

Yes. Dino is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Tinode under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Dino and Tinode with Docker?

Dino: check the project docs for container support. Tinode: yes.

Related comparisons