Converse.js vs Dino

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureConverse.jsDino
CategoryMatrix & XMPPMatrix & XMPP
LicenseMPL-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptVala
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 3,285★ 2,472
First released20132017
ReplacesSlackSkype, Slack

Why pick each one

Choose Converse.js if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
Converse.js details

Choose Dino if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Vala
Dino details

Frequently asked questions

Is Converse.js or Dino better?

Neither is universally better. Converse.js has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Converse.js and Dino free and open-source?

Yes. Converse.js is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Dino under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Converse.js and Dino with Docker?

Converse.js: yes. Dino: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons