Cinny vs Converse.js

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCinnyConverse.js
CategoryMatrix & XMPPMatrix & XMPP
LicenseAGPL-3.0MPL-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 3,826★ 3,285
First released20212013
ReplacesSlack, DiscordSlack

Why pick each one

Choose Cinny if…

  • Lightweight to host
  • Attractive interface
Cinny details

Choose Converse.js if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
Converse.js details

Frequently asked questions

Is Cinny or Converse.js better?

Neither is universally better. Cinny has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Cinny and Converse.js free and open-source?

Yes. Cinny is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Converse.js under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Cinny and Converse.js with Docker?

Cinny: yes. Converse.js: yes.

Related comparisons