Cinny vs conduwuit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cinny
Simple, elegant and secure Matrix client
VS
conduwuit
Well-maintained fork of the Conduit Matrix homeserver
| Feature | Cinny | conduwuit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,826 | ★ 24 |
| First released | 2021 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Slack, Discord | Slack, Discord |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Cinny or conduwuit better?
Neither is universally better. Cinny has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Cinny and conduwuit free and open-source?
Yes. Cinny is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and conduwuit under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cinny and conduwuit with Docker?
Cinny: yes. conduwuit: yes.