Continuwuity vs Dino

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureContinuwuityDino
CategoryMatrix & XMPPMatrix & XMPP
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageRustVala
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 700★ 2,472
First released20242017
ReplacesSlack, DiscordSkype, Slack

Why pick each one

Choose Continuwuity if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Continuwuity details

Choose Dino if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Vala
Dino details

Frequently asked questions

Is Continuwuity or Dino better?

Dino is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Continuwuity if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Continuwuity and Dino free and open-source?

Yes. Continuwuity is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Dino under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Continuwuity and Dino with Docker?

Continuwuity: yes. Dino: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons