Converse.js vs Tinode

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureConverse.jsTinode
CategoryMatrix & XMPPMatrix & XMPP
LicenseMPL-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 3,285★ 13,452
First released20132016
ReplacesSlackWhatsApp, Slack

Why pick each one

Choose Converse.js if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
Converse.js details

Choose Tinode if…

  • Good developer foundation
  • Multiple clients
  • Lightweight
Tinode details

Frequently asked questions

Is Converse.js or Tinode better?

Neither is universally better. Tinode has the larger community, while Converse.js is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Converse.js and Tinode free and open-source?

Yes. Converse.js is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Tinode under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Converse.js and Tinode with Docker?

Converse.js: yes. Tinode: yes.

Related comparisons