SHSelfHostIndex

DeepStack vs MediaMTX

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
DE DeepStack Self-hosted AI server for object and face detection VS ME MediaMTX Ready-to-use media server and RTSP/WebRTC proxy
FeatureDeepStackMediaMTX
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM2,048 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 818★ 19,747
First released20192019
ReplacesAmazon RekognitionWowza

Why pick each one

Choose DeepStack if…

  • Easy AI integration
  • Works with many NVRs
DeepStack details

Choose MediaMTX if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Wide protocol support
MediaMTX details

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepStack or MediaMTX better?

MediaMTX is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider DeepStack if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are DeepStack and MediaMTX free and open-source?

Yes. DeepStack is licensed under Apache-2.0 and MediaMTX under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run DeepStack and MediaMTX with Docker?

DeepStack: yes. MediaMTX: yes.

Related comparisons