DeepStack vs Frigate Mobile Companion
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
DeepStack
Self-hosted AI server for object and face detection
VS
Frigate Mobile Companion
Network video recorder front-end for review and clips
| Feature | DeepStack | Frigate Mobile Companion |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Python | HTML |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 818 | ★ 5,150 |
| First released | 2019 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Amazon Rekognition | Wowza |
Why pick each one
Choose Frigate Mobile Companion if…
- Easy to publish camera feeds
- Polished interface
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepStack or Frigate Mobile Companion better?
Frigate Mobile Companion is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider DeepStack if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are DeepStack and Frigate Mobile Companion free and open-source?
Yes. DeepStack is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Frigate Mobile Companion under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run DeepStack and Frigate Mobile Companion with Docker?
DeepStack: yes. Frigate Mobile Companion: yes.
Related comparisons
- DeepStack vs Cameradar
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Cameradar
- DeepStack vs CodeProject.AI Server
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs CodeProject.AI Server
- DeepStack vs CompreFace
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs CompreFace
- DeepStack vs go2rtc
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs go2rtc
- DeepStack vs MediaMTX
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs MediaMTX