mitmproxy vs Vinyl Cache
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
mitmproxy
Interactive HTTPS proxy for inspection and debugging
VS
Vinyl Cache
Web application accelerator/caching HTTP reverse proxy (formerly
| Feature | mitmproxy | Vinyl Cache |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 44,605 | — |
| First released | 2010 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Charles Proxy, Fiddler | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Vinyl Cache if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is mitmproxy or Vinyl Cache better?
mitmproxy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Vinyl Cache if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are mitmproxy and Vinyl Cache free and open-source?
Yes. mitmproxy is licensed under MIT and Vinyl Cache under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run mitmproxy and Vinyl Cache with Docker?
mitmproxy: yes. Vinyl Cache: yes.