mitmproxy vs Speed Test by OpenSpeedTest™
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
mitmproxy
Interactive HTTPS proxy for inspection and debugging
VS
Speed Test by OpenSpeedTest™
Free & Open-Source HTML5 Network Performance Estimation Tool
| Feature | mitmproxy | Speed Test by OpenSpeedTest™ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 44,605 | ★ 3,718 |
| First released | 2010 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Charles Proxy, Fiddler | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Speed Test by OpenSpeedTest™ if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is mitmproxy or Speed Test by OpenSpeedTest™ better?
mitmproxy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Speed Test by OpenSpeedTest™ if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are mitmproxy and Speed Test by OpenSpeedTest™ free and open-source?
Yes. mitmproxy is licensed under MIT and Speed Test by OpenSpeedTest™ under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run mitmproxy and Speed Test by OpenSpeedTest™ with Docker?
mitmproxy: yes. Speed Test by OpenSpeedTest™: yes.