mitmproxy vs socks5-proxy-server
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
mitmproxy
Interactive HTTPS proxy for inspection and debugging
VS
socks5-proxy-server
SOCKS5 proxy server with built-in authentication and Telegram-bot for
| Feature | mitmproxy | socks5-proxy-server |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 44,605 | ★ 142 |
| First released | 2010 | 2025 |
| Replaces | Charles Proxy, Fiddler | — |
Why pick each one
Choose socks5-proxy-server if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is mitmproxy or socks5-proxy-server better?
mitmproxy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider socks5-proxy-server if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are mitmproxy and socks5-proxy-server free and open-source?
Yes. mitmproxy is licensed under MIT and socks5-proxy-server under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run mitmproxy and socks5-proxy-server with Docker?
mitmproxy: yes. socks5-proxy-server: yes.