mitmproxy vs Pangolin
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
mitmproxy
Interactive HTTPS proxy for inspection and debugging
VS
Pangolin
Self-hosted tunneled reverse proxy with identity access
| Feature | mitmproxy | Pangolin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 44,605 | ★ 22,062 |
| First released | 2010 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Charles Proxy, Fiddler | Cloudflare Tunnel |
Why pick each one
Choose Pangolin if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 22.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is mitmproxy or Pangolin better?
mitmproxy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Pangolin if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are mitmproxy and Pangolin free and open-source?
Yes. mitmproxy is licensed under MIT and Pangolin under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run mitmproxy and Pangolin with Docker?
mitmproxy: yes. Pangolin: yes.