mitmproxy vs OAuth2 Proxy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
mitmproxy
Interactive HTTPS proxy for inspection and debugging
VS
OAuth2 Proxy
Reverse proxy that adds authentication to any web app
| Feature | mitmproxy | OAuth2 Proxy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 44,605 | ★ 14,808 |
| First released | 2010 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Charles Proxy, Fiddler | Cloudflare Access |
Why pick each one
Choose OAuth2 Proxy if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 14.8k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is mitmproxy or OAuth2 Proxy better?
mitmproxy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OAuth2 Proxy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are mitmproxy and OAuth2 Proxy free and open-source?
Yes. mitmproxy is licensed under MIT and OAuth2 Proxy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run mitmproxy and OAuth2 Proxy with Docker?
mitmproxy: yes. OAuth2 Proxy: yes.