mitmproxy vs MySpeed
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
mitmproxy
Interactive HTTPS proxy for inspection and debugging
VS
MySpeed
Speed test analysis software that shows your internet speed for up to
| Feature | mitmproxy | MySpeed |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 44,605 | ★ 2,977 |
| First released | 2010 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Charles Proxy, Fiddler | — |
Why pick each one
Choose MySpeed if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is mitmproxy or MySpeed better?
mitmproxy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider MySpeed if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are mitmproxy and MySpeed free and open-source?
Yes. mitmproxy is licensed under MIT and MySpeed under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run mitmproxy and MySpeed with Docker?
mitmproxy: yes. MySpeed: yes.