mitmproxy vs Holesail Switchboard
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
mitmproxy
Interactive HTTPS proxy for inspection and debugging
VS
Holesail Switchboard
Manage multiple holesail P2P tunnels from a single dashboard
| Feature | mitmproxy | Holesail Switchboard |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | free |
| Language | Python | HTML |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, one-click |
| GitHub stars | ★ 44,605 | ★ 1 |
| First released | 2010 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Charles Proxy, Fiddler | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Holesail Switchboard if…
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Written in HTML
Frequently asked questions
Is mitmproxy or Holesail Switchboard better?
Neither is universally better. mitmproxy has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are mitmproxy and Holesail Switchboard free and open-source?
Yes. mitmproxy is licensed under MIT and Holesail Switchboard under free. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run mitmproxy and Holesail Switchboard with Docker?
mitmproxy: yes. Holesail Switchboard: yes.