mitmproxy vs HAProxy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
mitmproxy
Interactive HTTPS proxy for inspection and debugging
VS
HAProxy
Reliable, high-performance TCP/HTTP load balancer
| Feature | mitmproxy | HAProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Python | C |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 44,605 | ★ 6,760 |
| First released | 2010 | 2001 |
| Replaces | Charles Proxy, Fiddler | F5 BIG-IP, AWS ELB |
Why pick each one
Choose HAProxy if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 6.8k GitHub stars
- Written in C
Frequently asked questions
Is mitmproxy or HAProxy better?
mitmproxy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider HAProxy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are mitmproxy and HAProxy free and open-source?
Yes. mitmproxy is licensed under MIT and HAProxy under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run mitmproxy and HAProxy with Docker?
mitmproxy: yes. HAProxy: yes.