mitmproxy vs HAProxy Data Plane API
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
mitmproxy
Interactive HTTPS proxy for inspection and debugging
VS
HAProxy Data Plane API
REST API for dynamic HAProxy configuration
| Feature | mitmproxy | HAProxy Data Plane API |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | binary, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 44,605 | ★ 389 |
| First released | 2010 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Charles Proxy, Fiddler | NGINX Plus API |
Why pick each one
Choose HAProxy Data Plane API if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is mitmproxy or HAProxy Data Plane API better?
mitmproxy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider HAProxy Data Plane API if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are mitmproxy and HAProxy Data Plane API free and open-source?
Yes. mitmproxy is licensed under MIT and HAProxy Data Plane API under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run mitmproxy and HAProxy Data Plane API with Docker?
mitmproxy: yes. HAProxy Data Plane API: yes.