mitmproxy vs relayd

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featuremitmproxyrelayd
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseMITISC
LanguagePythonC
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM256 MB32 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, sourcebare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 44,605★ 3,851
First released20102006
ReplacesCharles Proxy, FiddlerHAProxy, F5 BIG-IP

Why pick each one

Choose mitmproxy if…

  • Powerful for debugging
  • Highly scriptable
mitmproxy details

Choose relayd if…

  • Tightly integrated with OpenBSD
  • Very lightweight
relayd details

Frequently asked questions

Is mitmproxy or relayd better?

mitmproxy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider relayd if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are mitmproxy and relayd free and open-source?

Yes. mitmproxy is licensed under MIT and relayd under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run mitmproxy and relayd with Docker?

mitmproxy: yes. relayd: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons